Who is nestle chairman
Flemming previously led the transformation of biopharmaceutical company Shire to become the global leader in rare diseases. I believe that Galderma, as a newly focused pureplay dermatology business, has outstanding prospects built on its existing quality portfolio, team and rich pipeline of innovation.
I look forward to working with the talented Galderma team to further build on its success to date. Galderma will continue to invest in commercial excellence and innovation to meet the needs of health care professionals, patients, customers and consumers.
The company will continue to increase presence in the US and China, launch new products and focus on international expansion. The company will keep its headquarters in Switzerland. Flemming Ornskov is the non-executive Chairman of Recordati S. A and Centogene, and a director at Waters Corporation.
Ernst Tanner is Executive Chairman of the Board; all other members are non-executive members. In , he became Chairman of the Board. He is a member of the Corporate Sustainability Committee. He completed a commercial education and then attended business school in London and at Harvard. Tanner has been a member of the Board of Directors of the Swiss Swatch Group since , Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors since , as well as member of the Compensation Committee since and Chairman of this committee since May As of September 30, , Mr.
He completed his studies with a doctorate in economics. Due to his former executive activities for the Group and for an international premium food trading company, Mr. Click here to apply. There are a lot of things he cannot do, yet the performance of the company is his The codes of corporate governance duly spell certain things the chairman must do but if you have a good CEO who knows his job, who is doing the job the way it should be done, the job of the chairman is less tasking.
Click here. Related Posts. Electronic transmission of results and power of the people 21st October The leader Nigerians want in 21st October Nigeria: The earlier we negotiate, the better 21st October Next Post. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. FG set to revamp rubber industry. Ekiti: Fayemi inaugurates digital vehicle inspection centre. Genuine secessionist activism should be given attention, cleric tells Buhari.
FG set to revamp rubber industry 21st October Follow us on social media:. Welcome Back! Login to your account below. Forgotten Password? Create New Account! Fill the forms below to register. And here's the surprising thing: groups like the Freedom Fund lauded their transparency.
While Nestle was optimistic that their reveal would have a positive impact on supply chain accountability and the lives of workers, and the Freedom Fund's CEO, Nick Grono, agreed, saying: "Nestle's decision to conduct this investigation is to be applauded. If you've got one of the biggest brands in the world proactively coming out and admitting that they have found slavery in their business operations, then it's potentially a huge game-changer and could lead to real and sustained change in how supply chains are managed.
But just a few years later — in — The Sydney Morning Herald reported that Nestle had issued a warning: proposed legislation in Australia that would require companies to disclose their efforts to stop slavery in the supply chain would end up costing consumers some big bucks — making people wonder what side they were really on. In , The Guardian shared the heartbreaking story of a 6-year-old boy named Theron. For nearly a year, he was plagued by a painful rash.
The reason it kept coming back? He, his family, and others living in the same Six Nations indigenous reserve just outside of Toronto had no access to drinking water. It gets worse: those in the community had no taps, no toilets, and no showers. For water for cleaning and other non-drinking uses, they made regular journeys to a public tap, five miles away.
For drinking water, they had to go into town to buy bottled water. Where does Nestle come into the story? Just a stone's throw from where people live without clean running water, Nestle pumps nearly , gallons of springwater from the nearby Erin well — a well that sits on Six Nations land.
And that's not the only place that has a serious problem with Nestle extracting water for their bottling plants. In , conservationists pointed to the plight of California's Strawberry Creek as indicative of the problems Nestle was causing. Where the area was once made of a series of streams and waterfalls, many were running dry — a consequence, they said via The Guardian of Nestle's siphoning of 45 million gallons out of the ecosystem.
In , Indonesia was devastated by raging fires. The effects were catastrophic — in addition to the damage done by the flames themselves, millions of children were put at risk of serious complications due to the air pollution. So, what caused them in the first place? Palm oil producers. According to the Independent , an analysis by Greenpeace found 30 palm oil producers were at least partially responsible for the fires.
Of those, 28 sold palm oil to Nestle. Nestle issued a statement voicing their concern, and their commitment to making sure their products weren't made with palm oil associated with the fires. That sounds great, but also in , Nestle was suspended from the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil and forbidden from making claims that they used only sustainable palm oil via ABCNews. The organization cited Nestle's incomplete reporting on their palm oil sourcing, and at the same time, Greenpeace stepped in to say that even the RSPO wasn't doing nearly enough to keep the industry from destroying the habit of endangered animals like the orangutan.
Infant formula may be a huge part of Nestle's history, but starting in the s, it became one of their most controversial products. That, says Business Insider , is when Nestle found itself on the receiving end of accusations that they were specifically targeting mothers in developing countries, and selling them formula that was more expensive and less nutritious than breast milk.
At the same time research was showing a baby's chance of survival increased up to six times when breastfed, Nestle was accused of pushing their formula as a bit of Westernization that was absolutely within reach. Even hospitals were accused of working with Nestle to push their formula, and those same Third World mothers began trying to stretch the formula by diluting it, oftentimes with contaminated water.
That was decades ago, and here's the shocking thing: according to The Guardian , Nestle was still being condemned by groups like the Changing Markets Foundation for making misleading claims about its formula in
0コメント